Green Capital Venturists Steadfast in Face of Credit Crunch

Many intelligent investors will be asking themselves if the global credit crunch caused by the massive hemorrhage in the US housing sector has had a major impact on renewable resource investments.

The answer, as usual, is yes and no.

According to an information specialist in the renewable energy and carbon reduction industries, New Energy Finance, an estimated total of US $148.4 billion was invested in clean energy technologies, companies and projects in 2007.

In Q1 2008, investments in renewables dropped to $2.4 billion from $3.7 billion in 2007. That significant drop, however, was largely attributed to private equity, which dropped 64% from $2.5 billion in the first quarter 2007 to US $878 million in the first quarter 2008.

Venture capital investors continued to show confidence in the future of renewables, with $1 billion in investments in Q1 2008. Compare that with investments a year earlier of just $688 million, or an increase of 57%.

The data from New Energy (who put out excellent newsletters, by the way) suggests that while renewables are taking a hit in some regards, the overall performance in the sector and confidence of capital venturists will ride out the housing crisis comfortably.

This is bolstered by the performance of the NEX (WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index), which has stalled somewhat in the recent past but which continues to outperform the Nasdaq, S&P500 and AMEX Oil indexes.

The NEX is an index comprised of (at present) 89 companies worldwide focused on cleaner and/or renewable energies and technologies.

Investors cannot invest directly in the NEX, but some funds to follow the index’s list closely, such as PowerShares Global Clean Energy Portfolio (AMEX: PBD), which has an excellent track record.

1 Comment »

  Waste Plastic Technology wrote @ April 21st, 2008 at 6:16 pm

Green Financing remains slightly to the conservative with not enough people in their grouping that have knowledge of the number of alternative fuel options there are in our opinion. Myths still outweigh scientific reality and as usual GREEN has everyone running to it like lemmings over the cliff. Getting rid of plastic waste can be done safely with the new technology represented by ourselves as an example. Unfortunately the GREEN machine knows little about the potential yet is willing to examine biofuel as an example that pundents stated a few years back would affect food costs with the drive to put food into our automobiles instead of our mouths. Green financing walked right into the path of this moving SUV. Why is it that new pathways get muddled with such unthought out outcomes? It is serious and could prove costly to the world. A company like ours that has a workable solution is being studied to death only because it is plastic and the myth of burning plastic remains that it is unsafe. That is untrue as major tests from indendendent labs have proven. Anyway one awaits GREEN financing to catch up with good technologies and not continual chase popular ones.

Editor’s note: Interesting plug there. We’re not sure of your technology but if you want to call us for an ad spot, we’re available 24/7 ;-)

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>